Chief Dele Momodu seeks clarity on President Tinubu’s role on claims of  U.S. airstrikes in Nigeria

At a Glance

• No official Nigerian or U.S. records confirm foreign airstrikes conducted inside Nigeria.
• U.S. security cooperation with Nigeria remains advisory, logistical, and intelligence-focused, not combat-led.
• Unverified security claims risk misinformation, sovereignty concerns, and erosion of public trust.

Claims that the United States carried out airstrikes against terrorist targets inside Nigeria have circulated widely online, raising questions about foreign military involvement and national sovereignty. 

However, available evidence from official Nigerian and U.S. sources does not support those claims.

A review of public records, Nigerian security briefings, and statements from the U.S. Department of Defense shows no confirmation of U.S.-led airstrikes conducted on Nigerian territory in recent years.

U.S. Africa Command, which oversees American military operations on the continent, has repeatedly stated that its engagement in West Africa is primarily advisory, focusing on intelligence sharing, training, logistics, and surveillance support.

While Nigeria maintains long-standing security cooperation with the United States, kinetic military operations inside the country remain under Nigerian command. Unlike parts of the Sahel where multinational missions have been publicly announced, no such authorization or disclosure exists for airstrike operations in Nigeria.

The distinction is significant. Allegations of foreign airstrikes can heighten public anxiety over sovereignty, civilian safety, and command control, particularly in a country facing persistent security challenges. When such claims are not promptly clarified, speculation can quickly harden into perceived fact.

Public commentary by prominent figures has amplified these concerns, highlighting the growing influence of digital platforms in shaping security narratives. In democratic societies, citizens expect transparency during periods of heightened security attention. 

At the same time, operational constraints mean authorities cannot always release full details immediately.

Nigeria’s counterterrorism framework remains domestically driven, relying on its armed forces, intelligence agencies, and regional mechanisms such as the Multinational Joint Task Force. 

International partners, including the United States, the United Kingdom, and France, operate within defined support roles rather than as unilateral combat actors.

As misinformation spreads faster than official clarification, responsibility for accuracy rests with institutions, public figures, and media platforms alike. In matters of national security, precision is not optional, it is essential to public trust and informed debate.